by Little Sally » Thu Mar 09, 2023 10:27 am
Excellent points DocRick.
DocRick wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 3:16 am
I do have to agree with you. Strictly pornographic pictures in the SW realm can get a bit monotonous and there are a few contributors I just skip over for that reason.
Absolutely, I do the same. Their stuff serves a purpose for many so I never fuss about it, and it's each to their own I guess. There's nothing wrong with sexy erotic pictures of course, many of which are well done and amusing. But there's been a growing trend toward blatantly explicit crude depictions of sexual exploitation, which are the ones I tend to avoid.
DocRick wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 3:16 am
I prefer a bit of a storyline to go along with the photograph to add a little mental stimulation to the scenario.
Yes I've noted that with your work, and I think a little descriptive story often adds to the enjoyment (and gives the artist more enjoyment as well). I've done it myself on a few creations in the past. Not so much on here but on Deviant Art (which I'm hibernating at the moment).
DocRick wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 3:16 am
However, as the old adage says, "Absolute power corrupts absolutely" so it's a harsh reality that if a person had complete control of or power over another person, such as a miniature human, the exploitation of that power is bound to occur, regardless of the dynamics of the situation, whether it is Mf, Ff, Fm, Mm. Even if the SW was once a friend or lover, the urge to dominant and use would soon overcome any feelings of compassion. I once read a paper titled "The King Kong Theory" (or something like that) it concluded that during the first half of the 20th century when the hypocrisy of sex was in full force, i.e. sex out of wedlock was disgraceful, King Kong could just take it as he showed with his dominance over Ann Barrow by his sheer size and Ann had to accept it as she had no choice, thus taking the disgrace out of the act. The SW concept is very similar to the King Kong theory. If you are the giant, you can take what you want without consequence and if you are the "tiny", you get to go with it without having a guilty conscience. SW is very sexual by the basic nature of humankind.
You touch on some good points above, to which I found myself nodding in agreement.
I've always believed the size fantasy has always been about having (or accepting the loss of) power. Depending on whether you're
the dominant male figure or the woman on the receiving end in our own particular fantasy. And this can be played out or imagined in so many different situations or scenarios, it's always a constant source of fascination and never boring.
I'd better stop there, or I'll be writing an essay on it all lol!
Good to talk!
Excellent points DocRick.
[quote=DocRick post_id=28101 time=1678331791 user_id=30669]
I do have to agree with you. Strictly pornographic pictures in the SW realm can get a bit monotonous and there are a few contributors I just skip over for that reason.[/quote]
Absolutely, I do the same. Their stuff serves a purpose for many so I never fuss about it, and it's each to their own I guess. There's nothing wrong with sexy erotic pictures of course, many of which are well done and amusing. But there's been a growing trend toward blatantly explicit crude depictions of sexual exploitation, which are the ones I tend to avoid.
[quote=DocRick post_id=28101 time=1678331791 user_id=30669]I prefer a bit of a storyline to go along with the photograph to add a little mental stimulation to the scenario.[/quote]
Yes I've noted that with your work, and I think a little descriptive story often adds to the enjoyment (and gives the artist more enjoyment as well). I've done it myself on a few creations in the past. Not so much on here but on Deviant Art (which I'm hibernating at the moment).
[quote=DocRick post_id=28101 time=1678331791 user_id=30669]However, as the old adage says, "Absolute power corrupts absolutely" so it's a harsh reality that if a person had complete control of or power over another person, such as a miniature human, the exploitation of that power is bound to occur, regardless of the dynamics of the situation, whether it is Mf, Ff, Fm, Mm. Even if the SW was once a friend or lover, the urge to dominant and use would soon overcome any feelings of compassion. I once read a paper titled "The King Kong Theory" (or something like that) it concluded that during the first half of the 20th century when the hypocrisy of sex was in full force, i.e. sex out of wedlock was disgraceful, King Kong could just take it as he showed with his dominance over Ann Barrow by his sheer size and Ann had to accept it as she had no choice, thus taking the disgrace out of the act. The SW concept is very similar to the King Kong theory. If you are the giant, you can take what you want without consequence and if you are the "tiny", you get to go with it without having a guilty conscience. SW is very sexual by the basic nature of humankind.
[/quote]
You touch on some good points above, to which I found myself nodding in agreement.
I've always believed the size fantasy has always been about having (or accepting the loss of) power. Depending on whether you're
the dominant male figure or the woman on the receiving end in our own particular fantasy. And this can be played out or imagined in so many different situations or scenarios, it's always a constant source of fascination and never boring.
I'd better stop there, or I'll be writing an essay on it all lol!
Good to talk!