AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek: :ray_gun
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by Hand-Holder » Thu Sep 14, 2023 10:41 pm

You can brush whole areas or just spots and request fixes, the grils in the jars I get a good one on each 4 repeated requests... Nice start, is so far the best adult AI I tried

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by DocRick » Wed Sep 13, 2023 12:31 am

Prof Sai wrote:
Tue Sep 12, 2023 11:30 pm
I smashed the thread into little pieces!



Maybe they will be nice polite little pieces.
Well played.

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by Prof Sai » Tue Sep 12, 2023 11:30 pm

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by Prof Sai » Tue Sep 12, 2023 1:45 am

Ugg. This won't be easy:


Image

Also, there is lots of stuff that is wrong above, but I feel glubfebrugizquikch today and can't respond. No art either. :(

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by HHunter1 » Mon Sep 11, 2023 8:55 pm

I think there are a couple AI threads. I can't remember their titles though. You could start a group help thread.

HH1

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by Prof Sai » Mon Sep 11, 2023 7:51 pm

HHunter1 wrote:
Mon Sep 11, 2023 4:04 pm
We are so going to the Flamez selection.
Agree. I never liked "Flamez" though, as it seems like it is encouraging people to be jerks and harass each other. I'm only interested in conversation where there seems like a chance I could learn something new, or help others understand the world better.

Do we already have an AI thread somewhere?

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by HHunter1 » Mon Sep 11, 2023 4:04 pm

Wow you have a very confused information on who is doing what in your country. Historically yes it was Democratic Party that was against desegregation. But those leaning have been flipped. Conservative are now the ones trying to hide the past mistakes of the United States. They are the ones looking to hide Red Lining, the harshness of slavery, and the treatment of minorities. If you look into the groups pushing for the banning of books you'll find they are run and/or supported by conservative money.

HH1
We are so going to the Flamez selection.

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by DocRick » Mon Sep 11, 2023 3:20 pm

HHunter1 wrote:
Mon Sep 11, 2023 2:00 pm

I will have to point out that it's the conservatives banning books. Especially books on actual history and societal problems. As for the statues they want taken down, I agree that symbols of racism and hate shouldn't be placed in areas of community. If they are actually of historic significant then they should be moved to museums and labelled correctly.
Partially incorrect. Conservatives want to ban sexually explicit books from schools and school curriculum. The Democrats want to ban any book referring to slavery or segregation because it was they that owned slaves and they that fought against desegregation, and they don't want children to learn that fact.

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by HHunter1 » Mon Sep 11, 2023 2:00 pm

There is difference in using photoshop or equitant then entering prompts for AI. I also consider Poser/Daz/etc as a great tool for creating images. There is planning, placing, and blocking considerations for those tools. Your taking an image from you mind and assembling it. Not just allowing a set of algorithms guess your interests.

I tried cut and past art back in the day. I was terrible at it.

HH1
I will have to point out that it's the conservatives banning books. Especially books on actual history and societal problems. As for the statues they want taken down, I agree that symbols of racism and hate shouldn't be placed in areas of community. If they are actually of historic significant then they should be moved to museums and labelled correctly.

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by DocRick » Mon Sep 11, 2023 1:17 pm

HHunter1 wrote:
Mon Sep 11, 2023 12:28 pm

Oh, and if your wondering why the Muslim world suddenly stopped being a technologies and progressive leader, it was the Crusades. Not falling behind. Not ignoring advances. Its hard to be a pillar of civilization when armed groups of plague carrying people raid and pillage your Libraries and places of learning every couple of years. I mean Harvard is a prestigious University but I think the quality of the education there would drop dramatically if randomly every few years it was pillaged by barbarian raiders.

So no, I don't like AI created works and will be sadden by watching it become more and more accepts as art as time passes.

HH1
Don't forget the Spanish Inquisition, the conquest of the Incas and Mayans, Nazi Germany, even modern day Liberals banning books like Tom Sawyer, Catcher in the Rye, and destroying statues of historical figures. It always seems ideological extremists believe they can change history by removing it from memory, but it always leads to repetition of the same mistakes and atrocities. I don't know if Prof Sai uses AI but her work is not meant to look "real" and it is very enjoyable for what it is. PacificRoast uses Photoshop and his work looks real and is very enjoyable for what it is. Other CGI (used as a generic term for any computer created art) varies from comic book trash to very nice images that are still obviously not created from photographs. If you like it, enjoy it. AI has its place, but those of us who like the "old ways", will hopefully stay with it to fill our niche in the hobby. People always seem to fear new technology. I hated it when we first switched from typewrites to computers to type our police reports, once I learned how to use them, I loved them. Same with the computers in our cruisers. I avoided getting one installed in my cruiser as long as possible, but once I learned how to use it, if the system was down, I didn't want to do any work !! :lol: Sometimes history teaches us the skeptics were right, other times they were wrong. Bottom line, it's up to YOU which way you want to go and to keep your art form alive.

My first SW pictures were for an art project in the mid-1970's. I "cut and pasted", literally, pictures of women with giant alcohol bottles, and a few giant hands as a marketing concept. It went over very well, but as far as I know, no one ever connected it to "SW". Now, I could do the same thing with a computer. So, using advanced technology is not always bad, but yes, sometimes sticking to old ways is good too.

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by HHunter1 » Mon Sep 11, 2023 12:28 pm

I don't fear AI I know what it is. A crutch that will become depended on even though its unnecessary. Its not the modern equivalent of the printing press. It a hamburger in a bag you pick up at a road side gas station when they don't have a restaurant and you're hungry. Its quick, connivant, and technically food.

Ai is art by committee without the committee. It'll be the cheap means for companies to pump out more and more cookie cutter products. Heck cars all look the same now and that was before they fed a collection of algorithms some numbers and allow it to design for them. Soon the people complaining about greenscreen filmed movies looking fake will be able to add how fake the dialog is as well. Because its cheaper to computer generate a street corner then film a street corner will then translate to its cheaper to punch in scene requests then to pay people to write a scene.

Oh, and if your wondering why the Muslim world suddenly stopped being a technologies and progressive leader, it was the Crusades. Not falling behind. Not ignoring advances. Its hard to be a pillar of civilization when armed groups of plague carrying people raid and pillage your Libraries and places of learning every couple of years. I mean Harvard is a prestigious University but I think the quality of the education there would drop dramatically if randomly every few years it was pillaged by barbarian raiders.

So no, I don't like AI created works and will be sadden by watching it become more and more accepts as art as time passes.

HH1

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by Prof Sai » Mon Sep 11, 2023 5:30 am

HHunter1 wrote:
Mon Sep 11, 2023 3:20 am
I'm still not a fan. I know, your only using it as a tool. But when does that go from tool to entire project? When does it go from curious fun to crowding out personal creations? Why should someone bother to put effort into their art if people are going to accept what algorithms pump out with just a few inputted suggestions? Machines should be for making our lives easier so human's can create the art, this just seems to be the reverse.
What you fear is something we have always had to deal with. You are describing what Hollywood and he mass media usually are. Films, TV shows, and music go through so much executive planning, and bureaucratic algorithms that all personal investment is lost and creators end up feeling and acting like machines.

Gutenberg's press put all the scribes and monks out of business. But people today still practice calligraphy simply because they love the art and want to see what they can do with it. No reasonable person oil paints to make a living. People do art because they love it.

The new AI tools might save Hollywood some money, but they aren't going to fundamentally change what they do. But those tools DO fundamentally change what personal creators can do. Tools like AI and the internet let people entertain each other without need for big corporations controlling the message and taking all the profit. That is the real reason so many fear it.

Nations that fear and outlaw AI are simply going to be left behind by those places that embrace it. This happened to the muslim world in the 14th century. They had the most advanced technologies and progressive societies. And then they just sort of... stopped. And the formerly stagnant west passed them by. The future is for those who embrace change.
I have no intention of giving up Photoshop.
You should. Adobe is evil. Try the Gimp, Pixelmator, or Affinity Photo.

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by Pacific1982 » Mon Sep 11, 2023 4:53 am

DocRick wrote:
Mon Sep 11, 2023 3:01 am
Prof Sai wrote:
Mon Sep 11, 2023 2:54 am
Ta! The old ways are still formidable!

There's nothing wrong with the new ways, but Pacific1982 changing from his photoshop to AI, is like trading in a Lamborghini for a Tesla.
I have no intention of giving up Photoshop.

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by Pacific1982 » Mon Sep 11, 2023 4:51 am

HHunter1 wrote:
Mon Sep 11, 2023 3:20 am
I'm still not a fan. I know, your only using it as a tool. But when does that go from tool to entire project? When does it go from curious fun to crowding out personal creations? Why should someone bother to put effort into their art if people are going to accept what algorithms pump out with just a few inputted suggestions? Machines should be for making our lives easier so human's can create the art, this just seems to be the reverse.

HH1
I mostly agree. I’m just dabbling in it to see what the possibilities are. At its current power, it doesn’t even come close to giving me what I want exactly. No, for me it is not going to be used to create the entire project.

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by DocRick » Mon Sep 11, 2023 4:45 am

Prof Sai wrote:
Mon Sep 11, 2023 2:54 am
Ta! The old ways are still formidable!

Image

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by HHunter1 » Mon Sep 11, 2023 3:20 am

I'm still not a fan. I know, your only using it as a tool. But when does that go from tool to entire project? When does it go from curious fun to crowding out personal creations? Why should someone bother to put effort into their art if people are going to accept what algorithms pump out with just a few inputted suggestions? Machines should be for making our lives easier so human's can create the art, this just seems to be the reverse.

HH1

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by Prof Sai » Mon Sep 11, 2023 3:11 am

More like a Lamborghini for a Forklift. They just do different things, and neither is really a substitute for the other.

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by DocRick » Mon Sep 11, 2023 3:01 am

Prof Sai wrote:
Mon Sep 11, 2023 2:54 am
Ta! The old ways are still formidable!
There's nothing wrong with the new ways, but Pacific1982 changing from his photoshop to AI, is like trading in a Lamborghini for a Tesla.

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by Prof Sai » Mon Sep 11, 2023 2:54 am

Ta! The old ways are still formidable!

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by DocRick » Mon Sep 11, 2023 1:53 am

MaxSanhes wrote:
Sat Sep 09, 2023 5:55 pm
Almost. But you are on the right track. She needs to use a piece of plastic as a towel.

Image

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by Pacific1982 » Sat Sep 09, 2023 9:01 pm

I agree with all the criticism of the Skittles chick and her deformed cooch. It was just a quick one-off joke for the Skittles request post. ;)

And here is another AI generated image, which I think turned out pretty well. She is not a tiny SW, but she is smaller than normal for the scale of the kitty. And I did not bother to add any of my own touches, other than remove the word “porn” from the image. Anyway, I think it’s a keeper.


Image

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by MaxSanhes » Sat Sep 09, 2023 5:55 pm

Almost. But you are on the right track. She needs to use a piece of plastic as a towel.

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by Prof Sai » Sat Sep 09, 2023 5:42 pm

DocRick wrote:
Sat Sep 09, 2023 9:51 am
She has four hands and a weird cooch.
I didn't want to say anything, but yes, with AI you need to inspect the results carefully and break out the image editor. You can let a few details slide, but that cooch is the focus of the whole image, so it needs to be right.

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by Little Sally » Sat Sep 09, 2023 3:00 pm

DocRick wrote:
Sat Sep 09, 2023 2:42 pm
Little Sally wrote:
Sat Sep 09, 2023 2:33 pm
DocRick wrote:
Sat Sep 09, 2023 9:51 am



She has four hands and a weird cooch.
She has! I wonder if she looks the same on her other side when she rolls over? :lol:
Maybe a "bug" got into the system and gave her six legs or two legs and four arms, like in the movie "The Fly". :lol:
Lol! Great movie.

One thing for sure, I wouldn't want to be putting anything precious near that weird "cooch" she has! (If I were a fella that is) :shock:

Re: AI Generated with my own touches (f, nudity)

by DocRick » Sat Sep 09, 2023 2:42 pm

Little Sally wrote:
Sat Sep 09, 2023 2:33 pm
DocRick wrote:
Sat Sep 09, 2023 9:51 am



She has four hands and a weird cooch.
She has! I wonder if she looks the same on her other side when she rolls over? :lol:
Maybe a "bug" got into the system and gave her six legs or two legs and four arms, like in the movie "The Fly". :lol:

Top