by Pacific1982 » Sat Nov 11, 2023 3:32 pm
DocRick wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 10:09 am
This is why I loved your old work....it looked F**cking real !!!!
This is an example of my “old” work. The only thing here that was AI generated is the image of the girl. Everything else was done the way I’ve been doing it for years.
I don’t have plans to make extensive use of AI to do SW collages, as the results aren’t worth the effort. However, AI might be useful to me in generating a nude model in a specific pose, like sitting, standing, bending over, running away, etc. Google image search can do those things, but increasingly, the results are stock images with annoying watermarks on them, which must be removed. So I have to either spend time removing watermarks from a stock image, or clean up a bad mistake on an AI image. It’s about 50/50.[size=150][quote=DocRick post_id=35258 time=1699697367 user_id=30669][i][color=#BF0040]This is why I loved your old work....it looked F**cking real !!!![/quote][/color][/i]This [i]is[/i] an example of my “old” work. The only thing here that was AI generated is the image of the girl. Everything else was done the way I’ve been doing it for years.
I don’t have plans to make extensive use of AI to do SW collages, as the results aren’t worth the effort. However, AI might be useful to me in generating a nude model in a specific pose, like sitting, standing, bending over, running away, etc. Google image search can do those things, but increasingly, the results are stock images with annoying watermarks on them, which must be removed. So I have to either spend time removing watermarks from a stock image, or clean up a bad mistake on an AI image. It’s about 50/50.[/size]