by Little Sally » Wed Apr 17, 2024 5:53 pm
Prof Sai wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:53 pm
So what exactly do we call this? It is more than just upscaling, it takes effort and knowledge to do these. But neither is it original work. Remakes?
What effort and knowledge does it take to create porny AI images, with all the usual physical defects associated with AI?
Can't say they impress me, and they should be tagged for what they are in any case.
Prof Sai wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:53 pm
The likenesses of real actresses is an issue, but before AI, us photo manipulators had any choice but to do that. Most of these pics are too explicit for my tastes, so that colors my objection.
Yes, I always think it poor practice to simulate celebreties in sexually explicit situations. Like they'd be happy to see themselves like that? Not really fair I reckon.
Nice to see you active again btw, Sai.
[quote="Prof Sai" post_id=38824 time=1713372806 user_id=63]
So what exactly do we call this? It is more than just upscaling, it takes effort and knowledge to do these. But neither is it original work. Remakes? [/quote]
What effort and knowledge does it take to create porny AI images, with all the usual physical defects associated with AI?
Can't say they impress me, and they should be tagged for what they are in any case.
[quote="Prof Sai" post_id=38824 time=1713372806 user_id=63]
The likenesses of real actresses is an issue, but before AI, us photo manipulators had any choice but to do that. Most of these pics are too explicit for my tastes, so that colors my objection.
[/quote]
Yes, I always think it poor practice to simulate celebreties in sexually explicit situations. Like they'd be happy to see themselves like that? Not really fair I reckon.
Nice to see you active again btw, Sai. :)