by Little Sally » Wed Nov 16, 2022 7:48 pm
bobvan wrote: ↑Wed Nov 16, 2022 4:14 pm
Im curious about your "as long as it doesn't involve crude explicit sexual imagery. I'm not a prude but it bores me"
So the size thing is not a sexual fetish for you?
Interesting as mentioned the "porn" angle of mine is what drew the wrath of the religious fanatic priest.
Im already going to hell!
Warning if you decide to look @ my stories there are plenty but alot of story telling. I put alot into the series like Manfred is a prequel to Rescue from the tormenting GTS, The Trek episode, Home and the return is a trilogy ect.
I did quite well with selling projects for a while its dried up now. To give you an idea I charged $10.00 to $20.00 per render. There was more then the # reflected in the folder.
First things first. Is the size thing a sexual fetish for me? Well it depends on your interpretation of sexual I guess. To me, it's what I prefer to think of as an erotic fetish, which doesn't have to resort to the kind of imagery I alluded to earlier to be sexy (ie, graphic depictions of tiny women interacting with giant penises or being inserted into vaginas etc, etc, etc). I'm sure you know the kind of thing I mean, and there's been plenty of examples in recent times on this site. To me that's just porn for porns sake, and doesn't interest me in the slightest. I'm not knocking those who do like it though and good luck to them and lot's of jollies I say, but it just ain't my thing.
I prefer a much more subtle approach to sex, and it needn't be all about the sexual act to be a turn on for the mind. Unfortunately I'd need to write an essay to go fully into that side of things, but I'll leave it at that for now.
You've also got to consider the medium I use. Render artists aren't depicting "real" people as such, but computer generated versions of them using the tools they have and their own imagination. Which is cool and all well and good. However I
am using real people in the collages I create, so that requires a different approach in how I can go about things.
I rarely use "celeb" images, so most of my model stock is from my own archives, which includes using a person I know and occasionally myself. So I never ask my collage "girls" to do anything I wouldn't pose like myself. So being naked is never an option.
But yes I wiil explore your art more when sufficient time allows, and though I have seen a lot of it I know there's an awful lot I won't have.
bobvan wrote: ↑Wed Nov 16, 2022 4:14 pm
Below was my 1st Deanna Model that caught her attention
Well I think that's a really nice version of her, and I'm sure she'd have been flattered (even if the priest wasn't impressed lol!)
[quote=bobvan post_id=25437 time=1668615276 user_id=26507]
Im curious about your "as long as it doesn't involve crude explicit sexual imagery. I'm not a prude but it bores me"
So the size thing is not a sexual fetish for you?
Interesting as mentioned the "porn" angle of mine is what drew the wrath of the religious fanatic priest.
Im already going to hell! :D :D
Warning if you decide to look @ my stories there are plenty but alot of story telling. I put alot into the series like Manfred is a prequel to Rescue from the tormenting GTS, The Trek episode, Home and the return is a trilogy ect.
I did quite well with selling projects for a while its dried up now. To give you an idea I charged $10.00 to $20.00 per render. There was more then the # reflected in the folder.[/quote]
First things first. Is the size thing a sexual fetish for me? Well it depends on your interpretation of sexual I guess. To me, it's what I prefer to think of as an erotic fetish, which doesn't have to resort to the kind of imagery I alluded to earlier to be sexy (ie, graphic depictions of tiny women interacting with giant penises or being inserted into vaginas etc, etc, etc). I'm sure you know the kind of thing I mean, and there's been plenty of examples in recent times on this site. To me that's just porn for porns sake, and doesn't interest me in the slightest. I'm not knocking those who do like it though and good luck to them and lot's of jollies I say, but it just ain't my thing. :)
I prefer a much more subtle approach to sex, and it needn't be all about the sexual act to be a turn on for the mind. Unfortunately I'd need to write an essay to go fully into that side of things, but I'll leave it at that for now.
You've also got to consider the medium I use. Render artists aren't depicting "real" people as such, but computer generated versions of them using the tools they have and their own imagination. Which is cool and all well and good. However I [b]am[/b] using real people in the collages I create, so that requires a different approach in how I can go about things.
I rarely use "celeb" images, so most of my model stock is from my own archives, which includes using a person I know and occasionally myself. So I never ask my collage "girls" to do anything I wouldn't pose like myself. So being naked is never an option.
But yes I wiil explore your art more when sufficient time allows, and though I have seen a lot of it I know there's an awful lot I won't have.
[quote=bobvan post_id=25437 time=1668615276 user_id=26507]Below was my 1st Deanna Model that caught her attention
[url=https://postimages.org/][img]https://i.postimg.cc/13SgNs75/Untitled.png[/img][/url]
[url=https://postimg.cc/LhGh5FWL][img]https://i.postimg.cc/zXGhdJSt/45.jpg[/img][/url]
[/quote]
Well I think that's a really nice version of her, and I'm sure she'd have been flattered (even if the priest wasn't impressed lol!)