Little luxuries (3D render, nudity, unwilling)

Post your pictures of shrunken or otherwise tiny women in here
Post Reply
odastein
Shrink Aprentice
Shrink Aprentice
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2021 1:36 pm
Contact:

Little luxuries (3D render, nudity, unwilling)

Post by odastein » Tue May 11, 2021 10:37 am

That was one of my very first tiny girl themed render. Far from perfect, but I still like it.

Little luxuries 01a - Crying trinket.png
Little luxuries 01a - Crying trinket.png (864.71 KiB) Viewed 8074 times

Pacific1982
Shrink Master
Shrink Master
Posts: 704
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2018 9:28 pm
Gender:
Contact:

Re: Little luxuries (3D render, nudity, unwilling)

Post by Pacific1982 » Wed May 12, 2021 1:17 am

I prefer my SWs shrunk a little smaller, but other than that, this rendering is phenomenal! Especially with the big guy pulling off her clothing and the chick’s mascara running down from crying. Shadows, lighting, and colors look terrific.

odastein
Shrink Aprentice
Shrink Aprentice
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2021 1:36 pm
Contact:

Re: Little luxuries (3D render, nudity, unwilling)

Post by odastein » Wed May 12, 2021 3:42 am

Pacific1982 wrote:
Wed May 12, 2021 1:17 am
I prefer my SWs shrunk a little smaller, but other than that, this rendering is phenomenal! Especially with the big guy pulling off her clothing and the chick’s mascara running down from crying. Shadows, lighting, and colors look terrific.
Thank you very much. The poor thing was accustomed to freedom, and didn't expect to become a helpless sex toy. But she doesn't heve much of a choice now, sadly.

Unfortunately, I rarely do very small girls. At the contrary, I'm fond of of girls who are absurdly tall by most shrunken women lovers' standards (like 1/3 size or half size). But it occasionally happens.

User avatar
Prof Sai
Shrink Grand Master
Shrink Grand Master
Posts: 1567
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2018 11:27 pm
Gender:
Contact:

Re: Little luxuries (3D render, nudity, unwilling)

Post by Prof Sai » Wed May 12, 2021 8:13 am

That's fine with me. Even 2/3 size can be quite overwhelming to the victim.

LordAsteroth
Shrink Apprentice
Shrink Apprentice
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:52 pm
Gender:
Contact:

Re: Little luxuries (3D render, nudity, unwilling)

Post by LordAsteroth » Wed May 12, 2021 12:50 pm

For myself, I'm happy to see more girls in this size range. She's clearly small enough to be helpless, to be removed from the normal human experience, reduced down to her new Master's plaything, but big enough that different parts of her are distinct things for her owner to toy with.

User avatar
Shrinkmaster5000
Shrink Adept
Shrink Adept
Posts: 98
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 10:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Little luxuries (3D render, nudity, unwilling)

Post by Shrinkmaster5000 » Wed May 12, 2021 3:03 pm

Prof Sai wrote:
Wed May 12, 2021 8:13 am
That's fine with me. Even 2/3 size can be quite overwhelming to the victim.
Same! It's great for me because there is some realism to it, someone COULD be that small in real life, although rarely. It also allows them to interact with the world but with many more struggles (clothing, reaching, driving, doing everyday tasks) and people belittling them in public, etc.

Great render odastein!
Checkout my DeviantArt for more content! (Username: Shrinkmaster5000)
Checkout my Gumroad for more content! (Username: Shrinkmaster5000)
Checkout my Patreon for more content! (Username: Shrinkmaster5000)

Thanks for your support!

odastein
Shrink Aprentice
Shrink Aprentice
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2021 1:36 pm
Contact:

Re: Little luxuries (3D render, nudity, unwilling)

Post by odastein » Thu May 13, 2021 4:13 am

Prof Sai wrote:
Wed May 12, 2021 8:13 am
That's fine with me. Even 2/3 size can be quite overwhelming to the victim.
Well, I like size difference in general, and at some point in fact I had envisioned making a "normal" series in a world where women would be significantly smaller and weaker than in our world (but not to the point of shrunken women). I had done this. The first panel shows normal size differences. In the second, women are 10% smaller than normal, in the third 20% smaller. Each panel shows normal size variations within this range. The woman on the right is at the limit of the 10% tallest (based on actual real world variations), the woman in the middle is average, the woman on the left at the limit of the 10% shortest. So, I envisioned making women the size of the second (probably) or third (possibly) panel.

00 reference taille . Normal size  variations.png
00 reference taille . Normal size variations.png (1.5 MiB) Viewed 7580 times
00 reference taille . Fantasy 1  size variations -10 percent 87.9 83.3 78.4.png
00 reference taille . Fantasy 1 size variations -10 percent 87.9 83.3 78.4.png (1.48 MiB) Viewed 7580 times
00 reference taille . Fantasy 2  size variations -20 percent 78.2 74.1 69.7.png
00 reference taille . Fantasy 2 size variations -20 percent 78.2 74.1 69.7.png (1.45 MiB) Viewed 7580 times

Two things stopped me.

First, I think that the wide majority of people not into size difference would seriously dislike women so small. Especially since in fantasy, comics, games, etc...Women are at the contrary most often depicted taller than normal, more or less the same size as men. But, well, if I liked it, too bad if many others didn't.

The second issue was more of a problem and in fact prevented me from going along with the idea. In the current climate, with this size ranges, a lot of people unaware of the concept (and probably even if aware of the concept) would immediately assume that it depicts young teens or even children (once, again especially since people aren't even accustomed to see normally sized female characters, shorter than the male characters, like in my first panel above), unless I'd make abundantly clear in the depiction that they aren't : mandatory big tits and big hips, makeup, no freckles, no cute faces, no expression or pose that could look childish, etc... That would have been too restrictive for my taste, and so I renounced.

odastein
Shrink Aprentice
Shrink Aprentice
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2021 1:36 pm
Contact:

Re: Little luxuries (3D render, nudity, unwilling)

Post by odastein » Thu May 13, 2021 4:44 am

LordAsteroth wrote:
Wed May 12, 2021 12:50 pm
For myself, I'm happy to see more girls in this size range. She's clearly small enough to be helpless, to be removed from the normal human experience, reduced down to her new Master's plaything, but big enough that different parts of her are distinct things for her owner to toy with.
That's exactly my reasoning and why I prefer larger sized "tinies". I want the interesting parts to be well visible and easily manipulated with some precision. I want for instance to be able to pass my fingers between the lower lips and see them opening, and be able to target the clitoris with whatever implement I'm holding in my other hand. And similarly, I want her to be of some use. Her tongue shouldn't be *too* minuscule, for instance, I want to feel it.

A 35 cm (1 foot) girl, for instance, should be fine for these purposes, and as you point out, at this size she's still entirely helpless and defenceless.

I'm not as specific about the exact size as some people, though. I can see interesting uses for a variety of sizes, and in my fantasies, the girl often can be aggrandised or reduced at will.

odastein
Shrink Aprentice
Shrink Aprentice
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2021 1:36 pm
Contact:

Re: Little luxuries (3D render, nudity, unwilling)

Post by odastein » Thu May 13, 2021 4:52 am

Shrinkmaster5000 wrote:
Wed May 12, 2021 3:03 pm

Same! It's great for me because there is some realism to it, someone COULD be that small in real life, although rarely. It also allows them to interact with the world but with many more struggles (clothing, reaching, driving, doing everyday tasks) and people belittling them in public, etc.

Great render odastein!

Thank you. And I see that do yourself a lot of very good renders with larger sized SW. Although you concentrate on Female/female while I'm firmly in the Male/female camp.

User avatar
Prof Sai
Shrink Grand Master
Shrink Grand Master
Posts: 1567
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2018 11:27 pm
Gender:
Contact:

Re: Little luxuries (3D render, nudity, unwilling)

Post by Prof Sai » Thu May 13, 2021 9:15 pm

odastein wrote:
Thu May 13, 2021 4:13 am
mandatory big tits
That seems fine by me. But if women were always smaller, then socially it wouldn't be much different then reality in the 19th century. So what is the story about? The easy fix for "we aren't children" is to allow the characters to literally say that, by opening before they were shrunk. Then you have the plot and motivation of "who is shrinking people?" and "how do we restore ourselves?".

odastein
Shrink Aprentice
Shrink Aprentice
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2021 1:36 pm
Contact:

Re: Little luxuries (3D render, nudity, unwilling)

Post by odastein » Fri May 14, 2021 1:15 am

Prof Sai wrote:
Thu May 13, 2021 9:15 pm
odastein wrote:
Thu May 13, 2021 4:13 am
mandatory big tits
That seems fine by me. But if women were always smaller, then socially it wouldn't be much different then reality in the 19th century. So what is the story about? The easy fix for "we aren't children" is to allow the characters to literally say that, by opening before they were shrunk. Then you have the plot and motivation of "who is shrinking people?" and "how do we restore ourselves?".
Precisely, I wasn't thinking of a shrinking story. SW is only a fraction of what I do. I was thinking of a regular fantasy story, except in a world where there's a bigger size difference between men and women, because it has an erotic appeal to me. No shrinking or restoration involved because it would simply be the way things are in this world.

As for simply saying "we aren't children" at the beginning, it's not enough. I do images. People look at whatever appears in their feed at the moment, and judge on the basis of what they see. They certainly won't bother looking for context by checking all previous images. It's already a lot to expect that they will even read the text that goes with this specific image. Same with the guy who deletes inappropriate content. He has a couple seconds to decide, because he's paid by the number of posts he assessed. If whatever he sees looks underage to him, he will push the delete/warn/ban button, period.

As for making characters obviously identifiable as adults in every image, yes, it's possible. But I'm not interested in having to make every single female character into an oversexed, red-lipped, heavy hipped, big boobed woman. It could be OK for one specific, short story, but for a whole word background i would use for most of my images/stories, it's way too limitative. Especially since I'm not particularly fond of huge boobs.
Last edited by odastein on Fri May 14, 2021 4:10 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Prof Sai
Shrink Grand Master
Shrink Grand Master
Posts: 1567
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2018 11:27 pm
Gender:
Contact:

Re: Little luxuries (3D render, nudity, unwilling)

Post by Prof Sai » Fri May 14, 2021 3:01 am

But I'm not interested in having to make every single female character into an oversexed, red-lipped, heavy hipped, big boobed woman.
True, there are three of those that I don't like either. We live in a world where "sensitivity" has become an excuse for bullying. Telling any story is going to be a risk.

I wonder how elfquest deals with this. Their lead characters are four feet tall, and don't do what you are afraid might be necessary.

odastein
Shrink Aprentice
Shrink Aprentice
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2021 1:36 pm
Contact:

Re: Little luxuries (3D render, nudity, unwilling)

Post by odastein » Fri May 14, 2021 4:09 am

Prof Sai wrote:
Fri May 14, 2021 3:01 am
But I'm not interested in having to make every single female character into an oversexed, red-lipped, heavy hipped, big boobed woman.
True, there are three of those that I don't like either. We live in a world where "sensitivity" has become an excuse for bullying. Telling any story is going to be a risk.

I wonder how elfquest deals with this. Their lead characters are four feet tall, and don't do what you are afraid might be necessary.
Oh, Elfquest! I loved it so much when I was younger. So romantic! I was in love with some of the she-elves, and not even because of their size.

But it's entirely different. There's no significant sexual dimorphism between male elves and female elves in Elfquest. And rarely any eroticism (despite some lovely but very tame sex scenes, and even a couple orgies). While I do erotic, or even pornographic, scenes. And finally, the elves in elfquest aren't realistic characters, while 3D characters are. If I wanted to do a series with no size difference between males and females, no sex or even nudity, and no realistic characters, I could certainly make them short. But my intent was realistic characters of significantly different sizes having sex frequently.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 20 guests