Some Sai stuff sorted sortof

[Hand-Holder]

Completely adorable this invasive chibis

[Prof Sai]

[Prof Sai]

[Hand-Holder]

wowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

I got very weird nd unusable stuff, but this one is not bad at all, hope you master it, Im having a huge trouble trying that

I want to use only Pornlabs because I have freedom of nudity etc, so I wont try it in other mainstream areas

LOVE THIS, THANK YOU !!!

[HHunter1]

There is almost always that one little detail in an AI image that ruins it for me. Still much prefer human made images.

HH1

[Little Sally]

There is almost always that one little detail in an AI image that ruins it for me. Still much prefer human made images.

HH1

All credit to your discerning tastes sir!

I can always spot AI creations at a glance, but that won't matter a jot to the uninitiated. Not that I'll lose any sleep caring about it!

[bobvan2]

There is almost always that one little detail in an AI image that ruins it for me. Still much prefer human made images.

HH1

I can see why. I am getting back into it. There is fun to building and creating scenes. For the most part I am revamping really early stuff.

[Prof Sai]

Still much prefer human made images.

But... I'm still human, aren't I?

Not that I'll lose any sleep caring about it!

This.

I can see why. I am getting back into it. There is fun to building and creating scenes. For the most part I am revamping really early stuff.

I would not have been able to do these pics without all my experience making collages. It is just as much work, but I think the results are improved by using AI. For example, the "handheld" pic above is two renders, plus a pic I went to the woods to take. The "Restaurant" pic has 40 layers in Pixelmator.

[bobvan2]

I would not have been able to do these pics without all my experience making collages. It is just as much work, but I think the results are improved by using AI. For example, the "handheld" pic above is two renders, plus a pic I went to the woods to take. The "Restaurant" pic has 40 layers in Pixelmator.

And you got the hang of it

[Little Sally]

I would not have been able to do these pics without all my experience making collages. It is just as much work, but I think the results are improved by using AI. For example, the "handheld" pic above is two renders, plus a pic I went to the woods to take. The "Restaurant" pic has 40 layers in Pixelmator.

Don't feel offended by my own comments or indeed the other two members, I don't doubt you put a deal of effort into your creations. The main thing is you're enjoying what you do, and so will many who see it. You at least try to create something original (in your style) with the aid of AI, whereas a lot just amuse themselves with pictures of posed "pretty" ladies.

As I say, it isn't something that I'll lose any sleep over or feel I'll ever want to indulge in. But good luck to those who do.

[Prof Sai]

[DocRick]

Really like this one......the attention to detail is obvious. The slightly out of focus girl in the foreground, the reflections in the floor, the background. The blonde girl looks almost like a photograph, rather than a CGI. Only what I call the "too perfect" affect causes this to be identified as AI rather than a collage.

[DocRick]

Don't feel offended by my own comments or indeed the other two members, I don't doubt you put a deal of effort into your creations. The main thing is you're enjoying what you do, and so will many who see it. You at least try to create something original (in your style) with the aid of AI, whereas a lot just amuse themselves with pictures of posed "pretty" ladies.

As I say, it isn't something that I'll lose any sleep over or feel I'll ever want to indulge in. But good luck to those who do.

I tend to agree with you. I'm not into AI either, preferring photographic collaging. A lot of the AI images I've seen posted look very fake, which is okay if that's what you're going for, but some are really good, takes me a minute or two to figure out if it's AI or a photograph, on this forum as well as pictures I've found on search engines. This last image here is one of those. It nearly looks real. Very well done in my humble opinion.

And I prefer a little storyline imagination too rather than just a dirty SW picture. Regardless of the skill of the creator, it still gets boring after a while unless you're just looking for some..........Kleenex fodder.

[Prof Sai]

Back to my prefered level of unrealism. .
But I've got another realistic set percolating.

[Prof Sai]

[Prof Sai]

Sooo........

My next project is a ten page comic that is almost done.

It stars this person:



She is only seen normally on the first page, and is shrunk for the rest of it. The switch to high-realism seemed like a good idea at the time, but now I'm concerned. The whole thing is G rated. But, if I post this on my DeviantArt, I'll have a character with a child-like face next to pictures with cartoon boobies. Are people going to cause me trouble with this? I know InksGirls and some other artists have had stupidity attacks from them. Any thoughts?

[Little Sally]

The switch to high-realism seemed like a good idea at the time, but now I'm concerned. The whole thing is G rated. But, if I post this on my DeviantArt, I'll have a character with a child-like face next to pictures with cartoon boobies. Are people going to cause me trouble with this? I know InksGirls and some other artists have had stupidity attacks from them. Any thoughts?

I guess the only way to find out if it offends is to go ahead with it. Though going off some of the stuff that's allowed on DA, I can't see why it should. And maybe some sort of disclaimer might help? Something like "This is purely a work of fantasy fiction, and the characters and scenarios are not intended to represent real life issues or to cause any offence" (or some such waffle).

I must admit that some of the characters you're making of late (especially with the AI tools) are incredibly underage looking. So when portrayed with oversized bosoms it might tend to raise some eyebrows. I don't find it in any way pornographic myself, but there are people out there without any sense of humour whatsoever.

[Prof Sai]

I think it is because the AIs are trained on Pixar and anime - both of which I like. Scott McCloud has some ideas about why cartooning works the way it does, and why photo comics have never been successful. My own theory: If you stand next to someone, their face to your eyes, is the closest, and their feet to your eyes is further away. So your unconscious memory of them has those distortions. However if you see someone from far away, that distortion doesn't happen. So distorting a figure with big head, big eyes, creates an unconscious friendliness to the drawing, whereas accurate proportions seem more distant.

Of course trying to talk rationally about anything isn't going to work with bullies. So I get Mother Gothel to stare at them:

[Prof Sai]

[Prof Sai]

[Prof Sai]

[Prof Sai]

[Prof Sai]

[Prof Sai]

[Prof Sai]