Page 1 of 4
Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2022 6:25 pm
by ilayhu
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2022 6:01 am
by Prof Sai
These all suffer from a technical pitfall with SW images: Everything is all about the giants, with the littles hard to even see or empathize with. Not one image has the face of a little person clearly visible. It is just people enjoying being cruel. Not my thing, I guess.
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2022 2:48 pm
by Sumguy14
My big complaint with the site is that they are posting previously available works as if they are new content about every other week. I also have a hard time justifying the membership fee when we only get 20 images a week. It's nothing personal, but I think I am done supporting the site until there is a build up of content that I don't already own.
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2022 3:37 pm
by kira123
Sumguy14 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 06, 2022 2:48 pm
My big complaint with the site is that they are posting previously available works as if they are new content about every other week. I also have a hard time justifying the membership fee when we only get 20 images a week. It's nothing personal, but I think I am done supporting the site until there is a build up of content that I don't already own.
Sometimes they even do remakes of past comics with newer programs or something. Nothing's changed except for the models and program themselves. Which makes things kinda bland and unremarkable. Like if you're gonna remake a past comic, add more into it than that to stand out.
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2022 12:58 am
by ilayhu
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2022 2:59 pm
by JOE66
Thanks for these super pictures!
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2022 3:18 pm
by ilayhu
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:01 pm
by kira123
Liking "Who's the Boss? 5" so far.
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 3:55 pm
by ilayhu
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2022 4:21 pm
by ilayhu
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2022 5:27 am
by ilayhu
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2022 2:59 pm
by ilayhu
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2022 5:53 pm
by ilayhu
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2022 4:23 pm
by Bobascher
It’s disappointing the site is choosing to use models that look like children
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2022 3:18 pm
by ilayhu
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2022 3:22 pm
by Who is confused ?
ilayhu wrote: ↑Mon Dec 26, 2022 3:18 pm
Greetings, thanks for the comment, here another set, hope you enjoy them
best regards
ilayhu
You should read the comment as well.
Bobascher wrote: ↑Fri Dec 23, 2022 4:23 pm
It’s disappointing the site is choosing to use models that look like children
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2022 4:52 pm
by bobvan
Bobascher wrote: ↑Fri Dec 23, 2022 4:23 pm
It’s disappointing the site is choosing to use models that look like children
Who cares as long as they are not in sexual situations.
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2022 11:20 am
by Bobascher
bobvan wrote: ↑Mon Dec 26, 2022 4:52 pm
Who cares as long as they are not in sexual situations.
It is still on an adult fetish site. When the simple interaction of a two people of different sizes is titillating to some in the community, it is a sexual situation when it was created to satisfy someone of this fetish if everyone’s clothes remain on.
I get this is apparently a complicated subject, but it is needless in this regard. They can just use adult models, or they can remove all sexual content and claim it is a GT site exploring the trope of size play. But when there is a kid poking and prodding the body of a naked adult in a nonconsensual manner, that is shrinking porn.
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2022 4:18 pm
by Hand-Holder
Knew that website already, but thanks for the Pics... Is good to know there are several SW resources online besides GTS
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2022 4:33 pm
by bobvan
Bobascher wrote: ↑Tue Dec 27, 2022 11:20 am
bobvan wrote: ↑Mon Dec 26, 2022 4:52 pm
Who cares as long as they are not in sexual situations.
It is still on an adult fetish site. When the simple interaction of a two people of different sizes is titillating to some in the community, it is a sexual situation when it was created to satisfy someone of this fetish if everyone’s clothes remain on.
So if we go by what you just said the last chapter of "Little Sally" I just posted makes me a Pedo? O..K you know all bout me
My fantasy is based on LOTG little people were threatened by giant men wimin children insects, animals and environment itself.
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2022 5:45 pm
by Bobascher
bobvan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 27, 2022 4:33 pm
So if we go by what you just said the last chapter of "Little Sally" I just posted makes me a Pedo? O..K you know all bout me
My fantasy is based on LOTG little people were threatened by giant men wimin children insects, animals and environment itself.
No, I did not say “bobvan is a pedo” anywhere. You are the one implying I saying that. I am saying that including children in pictures poking naked women provocatively is most likely child porn.
The child doesn’t have to be naked to be put into a sexual situation. I have no doubt there have been many clothed children in the real world made to touch an adult’s genitalia and I doubt anyone would question if that is pedo.
Just because it is a drawing or 3D model doesn’t obviate this fact. Anymore than a drawing of two adults having sex is most likely still porn. So if you have produced a picture of a child touching an adult in a sexually provocative nature, then you created child porn in my mind.
Now whether creating CP makes one a pedo or not, I can’t say. I don’t know what your proclivities are. You have to tell us that.
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2022 6:03 pm
by bobvan
Bobascher wrote: ↑Tue Dec 27, 2022 5:45 pm
bobvan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 27, 2022 4:33 pm
So if we go by what you just said the last chapter of "Little Sally" I just posted makes me a Pedo? O..K you know all bout me
My fantasy is based on LOTG little people were threatened by giant men wimin children insects, animals and environment itself.
No, I did not say “bobvan is a pedo” anywhere. You are the one implying I saying that. I am saying that including children in pictures poking naked women provocatively is most likely child porn.
The child doesn’t have to be naked to be put into a sexual situation. I have no doubt there have been many clothed children in the real world made to touch an adult’s genitalia and I doubt anyone would question if that is pedo.
Just because it is a drawing or 3D model doesn’t obviate this fact. Anymore than a drawing of two adults having sex is most likely still porn. So if you have produced a picture of a child touching an adult in a sexually provocative nature, then you created child porn in my mind.
Now whether creating CP makes one a pedo or not, I can’t say. I don’t know what your proclivities are. You have to tell us that.
I agree I often say I create 3D fetish porn. Having said that chapters with children are never of sexual nature, its more about the power of them using little people as playthings. I had a pedo fan on D/A I know the difference. BTW this was only meant as a point of discussion
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2022 8:44 pm
by bobvan
bobvan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 27, 2022 6:03 pm
Bobascher wrote: ↑Tue Dec 27, 2022 5:45 pm
bobvan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 27, 2022 4:33 pm
So if we go by what you just said the last chapter of "Little Sally" I just posted makes me a Pedo? O..K you know all bout me
My fantasy is based on LOTG little people were threatened by giant men wimin children insects, animals and environment itself.
No, I did not say “bobvan is a pedo” anywhere. You are the one implying I saying that. I am saying that including children in pictures poking naked women provocatively is most likely child porn.
The child doesn’t have to be naked to be put into a sexual situation. I have no doubt there have been many clothed children in the real world made to touch an adult’s genitalia and I doubt anyone would question if that is pedo.
Just because it is a drawing or 3D model doesn’t obviate this fact. Anymore than a drawing of two adults having sex is most likely still porn. So if you have produced a picture of a child touching an adult in a sexually provocative nature, then you created child porn in my mind.
Now whether creating CP makes one a pedo or not, I can’t say. I don’t know what your proclivities are. You have to tell us that.
I agree I often say I create 3D fetish porn. Having said that chapters with children are never of sexual nature, its more about the power of them using little people as playthings. I had a pedo fan on D/A I know the difference. Creating CP = Child porn took me a few to get that. I don't create CP as far as I am concerned. There are simply chapters in some of my LOTG episode that have porn & some that have Children. There is NEVER any porn in their chapters.
Does that make it CP? As previously mentioned, the last little Sally chapter where she is given to a little girl as a gift. Out of respect for Sally, there is no porn in her thread. Does the fact it's posted on this site forum make it CP? I think that is an uptight POV & a stretch IMO.
BTW this was only meant as a point of discussion
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2022 8:49 pm
by bobvan
bobvan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 27, 2022 8:44 pm
bobvan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 27, 2022 6:03 pm
Bobascher wrote: ↑Tue Dec 27, 2022 5:45 pm
No, I did not say “bobvan is a pedo” anywhere. You are the one implying I saying that. I am saying that including children in pictures poking naked women provocatively is most likely child porn.
The child doesn’t have to be naked to be put into a sexual situation. I have no doubt there have been many clothed children in the real world made to touch an adult’s genitalia and I doubt anyone would question if that is pedo.
Just because it is a drawing or 3D model doesn’t obviate this fact. Anymore than a drawing of two adults having sex is most likely still porn. So if you have produced a picture of a child touching an adult in a sexually provocative nature, then you created child porn in my mind.
Now whether creating CP makes one a pedo or not, I can’t say. I don’t know what your proclivities are. You have to tell us that.
I agree I often say I create 3D fetish porn. Having said that chapters with children are never of sexual nature, its more about the power of them using little people as playthings. I had a pedo fan on D/A I know the difference. Creating CP = Child porn took me a few to get that. I don't create CP as far as I am concerned. There are simply chapters in some of my LOTG episode that have porn & some that have Children. There is NEVER any porn in their chapters.
Does that make it CP? As previously mentioned, the last little Sally chapter I recently posted, where she is given to a little girl as a gift. Out of respect for Sally. There is no porn in her thread period. Does the fact it's posted on this forum make it CP? I think that is an uptight POV & a stretch IMO.
I do get your point in regards to the above-mentioned imagery.
BTW this was only meant as a point of discussion
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2022 8:56 pm
by Bobascher
I appreciate the discussion and honestly I have probably drawn some hard lines. I know some of my earlier pieces had a shrunken kid that I posted to DA. Then I had some interactions with some true pedos and maybe I over course corrected, but I feel it’s safer TBH.
Not saying that interactions between kids and adults in shrunken scenarios can’t be cute / platonic / nonsexual, but given the venue we are in, it treads a line to me.
In some of my other photoshop work which isn’t posted to a “bobascher” account, such as Facebook photoshop requests, I do still make art with children and shrinking troupes (e.g., putting kids in hot chocolate cups, putting kids in costumes inside toy boxes as if they are the toy), but it’s in a clearly not fetish venue.
So again, not calling anyone a pedo, but using kids in any fetish site or in a fetish adjacent context gets really squeamish for me, particularly since, as you and I have experienced, there are many pedos with this kink. Having that in time and space barrier really makes things safer.
