Who needs real actors anymore ?Little Sally wrote: ↑Thu Dec 22, 2022 6:39 pmHa I see where I might have confused you.Hand-Holder wrote: ↑Thu Dec 22, 2022 6:07 pm
There seams to be a great confusion here, again, im not saying that software is good for you, or you should try, never said that
You said
We have the cinematic technology to make these things really happen on the silver screen nowadays, but nobody seems willing to take on this kind of theme.
So Im saying
This software is one excellent example of a way for the cinematic tech to reach common creators and not just big studios, so soon we will have many more people willing to take on this kind of theme
When I said we have the cinematic technology to create things nowadays, I was referring to the use of CGI effects in films like Jurassic Park and Peter Jackson's King Kong and Lord of The Rings etc. All of which had real actors seeming to interact with amazing creatures which weren't actually there in reality. There were other props used to create these effects of course which didn't involve CGI, but CGI was the major breakthrough at the time. I wasn't referring to movies made entirely from the technology that you've been giving examples of, but films involving real people and not character animations of people.
I don't know what effects were used in 'Downsizing' for example, but if a film like that is possible to make, then it's possible to create a movie based on Bob's illustrations above. But created using real people.
And that is what I was alluding to.
3D is already 95% human in some softwares
Real actors mixed with good special effects demand a massive budget and those guys/studios are too woke to go into SW, at least in the naughty way we reach