Catching her trying to run away (f, nudity)

[Pacific1982]

In the great outdoors.

[eddiegiantman]

Meep meep, the hand is quicker than the tiny.

[Little Sally]

Meep meep, the hand is quicker than the tiny.

Lol! It seems these "AI" gals are a bit slow on the uptake!

[DocRick]

Meep meep, the hand is quicker than the tiny.

Lol! It seems these "AI" gals are a bit slow on the uptake!

Maybe they need more gigabytes?

[Little Sally]

Meep meep, the hand is quicker than the tiny.

Lol! It seems these "AI" gals are a bit slow on the uptake!

Maybe they need more gigabytes?

Or Mr Pencil "prompts"?

[DocRick]

Lol! It seems these "AI" gals are a bit slow on the uptake!

Maybe they need more gigabytes?

Or Mr Pencil "prompts"?

[WhoIsOutOfOrder]

Pacific1982, your use of AI and your own photoshop skill is the perfect combination. There are some glitches (feet/hands) but in a few months this will be a thing of the past. Nobody will be able if your model was AI generated or something from the web. And i wonder what madness you can generate then.All of your pictures are great and AI is just another tool!

[Pacific1982]

Pacific1982, your use of AI and your own photoshop skill is the perfect combination. There are some glitches (feet/hands) but in a few months this will be a thing of the past. Nobody will be able if your model was AI generated or something from the web. And i wonder what madness you can generate then.All of your pictures are great and AI is just another tool!

Thank you, WhoIsOutOfOrder. I should like to mention that the AI-generated female in this image had a crappy-looking face/head, so it was necessary for me to swap it out with a replacement. The background/setting of the woman was acceptable, but in order to sell the idea that she’d been shrunk, I added the crushed soda pop can to further indicate the scale.

[Little Sally]

Pacific1982, your use of AI and your own photoshop skill is the perfect combination. There are some glitches (feet/hands) but in a few months this will be a thing of the past. Nobody will be able if your model was AI generated or something from the web. And i wonder what madness you can generate then.All of your pictures are great and AI is just another tool!

I suppose time will tell whether you'll be right. But at the moment, I think Pacific's normal (or previous) work using "real" females is much better and more convincing.

Thank you, WhoIsOutOfOrder. I should like to mention that the AI-generated female in this image had a crappy-looking face/head, so it was necessary for me to swap it out with a replacement. The background/setting of the woman was acceptable, but in order to sell the idea that she’d been shrunk, I added the crushed soda pop can to further indicate the scale.

I quite like the composition overall and it works well, with the only glaring anomaly being that deformed looking AI hand.



So, I decided to weave my magic and replace it with one that looks more natural. I hope that's ok with you?
I enjoy doing a bit of Photoshop surgery!

[Pacific1982]

So, I decided to weave my magic and replace it with one that looks more natural. I hope that's ok with you? I enjoy doing a bit of Photoshop surgery!

Thanks, Sally! That looks great!

[Little Sally]

So, I decided to weave my magic and replace it with one that looks more natural. I hope that's ok with you? I enjoy doing a bit of Photoshop surgery!

Thanks, Sally! That looks great!

Hey, you're very welcome Mr P. I'm thinking of taking up AI surgery as a new hobby lol!

[DocRick]

with the only glaring anomaly being that deformed looking AI hand.


So, I decided to weave my magic and replace it with one that looks more natural. I hope that's ok with you?
I enjoy doing a bit of Photoshop surgery! [/size]

I didn't even notice the hand, but I try to look at the forest not the trees. Too many squirrels in the trees.

[Prof Sai]

Hey, you're very welcome Mr P. I'm thinking of taking up AI surgery as a new hobby lol!

Save me Dr Sally!

[Little Sally]

I didn't even notice the hand, but I try to look at the forest not the trees. Too many squirrels in the trees.

True. The broader picture is what matters really, and it was a good one.

Save me Dr Sally!

Lol! If you ever think I can help just message me. It keeps me out of mischief.

[Prof Sai]

Lol! If you ever think I can help just message me. It keeps me out of mischief.

Can you help me fix the hands on this one?

[Little Sally]

Lol! If you ever think I can help just message me. It keeps me out of mischief.

Can you help me fix the hands on this one?

(image)

Possibly not haha!

But if we were to ask a previous president (nicely) to stage a rally, maybe that would make them run and hide!

[Prof Sai]

They are already running and trying to hide.

You are welcome to look at my collection and fix what looks like a problem. It can happen that in all the production and revision I can miss details.

[Little Sally]

You are welcome to look at my collection and fix what looks like a problem. It can happen that in all the production and revision I can miss details.

Well if it was anything specific (or glaring) you were unhappy with, message me about it, but I'm sure most of your output is just fine the way it is. The hand of Pacific's little lady just caught my eye so I managed to fix it, but other than that the pic was just great.

It's like DocRick was saying, it's the overall picture that makes a thing work for someone (ie, the whole forest, and not every little branch and leaf). And from what I've seen of your creations, they all work really good.

It wasn't my intention to make folks hyper critical of what they putting out, far from it (I'm critical enough of my own stuff as it is)

Ps. And I hope I'm forgiven for getting another thread side tracked. Sorry Mr P.

[Prof Sai]

The background/setting of the woman was acceptable, but in order to sell the idea that she’d been shrunk, I added the crushed soda pop can to further indicate the scale.

It doesn't quite work for me though. The texture of the road reveals the scale, and makes her look normal sized. To get a good SW background, it is rare to find usable stock images. You have to get a good camera and go outside.

[DocRick]

The background/setting of the woman was acceptable, but in order to sell the idea that she’d been shrunk, I added the crushed soda pop can to further indicate the scale.

It doesn't quite work for me though. The texture of the road reveals the scale, and makes her look normal sized. To get a good SW background, it is rare to find usable stock images. You have to get a good camera and go outside.

My brain saw this as the opening of a cave. Looking at it again, now I can see it as a road.

[Little Sally]

The background/setting of the woman was acceptable, but in order to sell the idea that she’d been shrunk, I added the crushed soda pop can to further indicate the scale.

It doesn't quite work for me though. The texture of the road reveals the scale, and makes her look normal sized. To get a good SW background, it is rare to find usable stock images. You have to get a good camera and go outside.

My brain saw this as the opening of a cave. Looking at it again, now I can see it as a road.

Another alternative could be, that a marauding giant is capturing her (having just discarded his can of coke)

[DocRick]

My brain saw this as the opening of a cave. Looking at it again, now I can see it as a road.

Another alternative could be, that a marauding giant is capturing her (having just discarded his can of coke)
[/quote]

Of course. Every Jack in the Beanstalk movie has the giants drinking Coke.....but never Pepsi.

[Little Sally]

My brain saw this as the opening of a cave. Looking at it again, now I can see it as a road.

Another alternative could be, that a marauding giant is capturing her (having just discarded his can of coke)

Of course. Every Jack in the Beanstalk movie has the giants drinking Coke.....but never Pepsi.

Don't blame me for his taste in refreshments! Anyway, you're the one who said not to look for the squirrels in the trees!

Btw Doc, you've really messed up the replying with quotes in your post above. You've made it look like I'm saying what you've said lol!

[DocRick]

Btw Doc, you've really messed up the replying with quotes in your post above. You've made it look like I'm saying what you've said lol!

Sorry, but quotes within quotes is far too technical for me.

[Prof Sai]

This is now the "Mess With Pacific's Art" thread.



It's like talking with pictures instead of words!