Shrunken women board

I really struggle with you saying this is your content when you clearly took someone else’s work and then used AI to reskin it. Clearly some of these were originally Tedge’s work. No doubt there is some nontrivial work to set up an image generator, but this feels a lot closer to just taking his work…

Bobascher wrote: ↑

Fri Mar 15, 2024 6:55 pm

I really struggle with you saying this is your content when you clearly took someone else’s work and then used AI to reskin it. Clearly some of these were originally Tedge’s work. No doubt there is some nontrivial work to set up an image generator, but this feels a lot closer to just taking his work…

Fair comment Bob.

In any event, it should have been tagged appropriately as graphic porny imagery, or posted in another section (in my own opinion of course)

Little Sally wrote: ↑

Fri Mar 15, 2024 10:58 pm

Bobascher wrote: ↑

Fri Mar 15, 2024 6:55 pm

I really struggle with you saying this is your content when you clearly took someone else’s work and then used AI to reskin it. Clearly some of these were originally Tedge’s work. No doubt there is some nontrivial work to set up an image generator, but this feels a lot closer to just taking his work…

Fair comment Bob.

In any event, it should have been tagged appropriately as graphic porny imagery, or posted in another section (in my own opinion of course)

I would tag it as creepy nsfw stolen "artwork". I did the same thing with old collages from the early 2000s just to see what Stable Diffusion and Photoshop can do with it. This is just a no brainer, anyone can "create" "new" pictures this way.
To claim "just some stuff i made" is

A lot of this looks like the creator battlefiel56 on DA -- He left that platform and I was hoping that this was the return. Looks like it isn't. Does the original artist have another site?

shrinker_s wrote: ↑

Sat Mar 16, 2024 4:42 pm

A lot of this looks like the creator battlefiel56 on DA -- He left that platform and I was hoping that this was the return. Looks like it isn't. Does the original artist have another site?

i am him, there was another account with the name of mrmaybe59, but da is hostile nowadays

Your work is great.. You've got some real talent - keep it up.
I get you on the DA thing....I had thought the D was for Deviant....

Would love to see more of your stuff... Have you thought of maybe packaging some and put them up on MEGA or a site like that?

another AI test

Bobascher wrote: ↑

Fri Mar 15, 2024 6:55 pm

I really struggle with you saying this is your content when you clearly took someone else’s work and then used AI to reskin it. Clearly some of these were originally Tedge’s work. No doubt there is some nontrivial work to set up an image generator, but this feels a lot closer to just taking his work…

So what exactly do we call this? It is more than just upscaling, it takes effort and knowledge to do these. But neither is it original work. Remakes?
Linking to the original pics might help.

The likenesses of real actresses is an issue, but before AI, us photo manipulators had any choice but to do that. Most of these pics are too explicit for my tastes, so that colors my objection.

Prof Sai wrote: ↑

Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:53 pm

So what exactly do we call this? It is more than just upscaling, it takes effort and knowledge to do these. But neither is it original work. Remakes?

What effort and knowledge does it take to create porny AI images, with all the usual physical defects associated with AI?
Can't say they impress me, and they should be tagged for what they are in any case.

Prof Sai wrote: ↑

Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:53 pm

The likenesses of real actresses is an issue, but before AI, us photo manipulators had any choice but to do that. Most of these pics are too explicit for my tastes, so that colors my objection.

Yes, I always think it poor practice to simulate celebreties in sexually explicit situations. Like they'd be happy to see themselves like that? Not really fair I reckon.

Nice to see you active again btw, Sai.

Little Sally wrote: ↑

Wed Apr 17, 2024 5:53 pm

What effort and knowledge does it take to create porny AI images, with all the usual physical defects associated with AI?
Can't say they impress me, and they should be tagged for what they are in any case.

About the same as your avatar with it's cut-out defects.

Prof Sai wrote: ↑

Wed Apr 17, 2024 9:46 pm

Little Sally wrote: ↑

Wed Apr 17, 2024 5:53 pm

What effort and knowledge does it take to create porny AI images, with all the usual physical defects associated with AI?
Can't say they impress me, and they should be tagged for what they are in any case.

About the same as your avatar with it's cut-out defects.

Lol! There ain't no defects on that clever clogs, but then you wouldn't know a proper defect if it bit you on the bum! (apparently)

(just kidding about that last bit of course)

Who says AI is going to destroy humanity? Seems pretty good to me so far.

dubiouskey wrote: ↑

Thu May 02, 2024 10:07 pm

Who says AI is going to destroy humanity? Seems pretty good to me so far.

Seems you'll fit in well here then.