just some stuff i made
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2024 12:23 pm
A place to discuss those freshly shrunken and other minigirls
https://shrunken-women-board.com/phpBB3/
https://shrunken-women-board.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=6297
Fair comment Bob.Bobascher wrote: ↑Fri Mar 15, 2024 6:55 pmI really struggle with you saying this is your content when you clearly took someone else’s work and then used AI to reskin it. Clearly some of these were originally Tedge’s work. No doubt there is some nontrivial work to set up an image generator, but this feels a lot closer to just taking his work…
I would tag it as creepy nsfw stolen "artwork". I did the same thing with old collages from the early 2000s just to see what Stable Diffusion and Photoshop can do with it. This is just a no brainer, anyone can "create" "new" pictures this way.Little Sally wrote: ↑Fri Mar 15, 2024 10:58 pmFair comment Bob.Bobascher wrote: ↑Fri Mar 15, 2024 6:55 pmI really struggle with you saying this is your content when you clearly took someone else’s work and then used AI to reskin it. Clearly some of these were originally Tedge’s work. No doubt there is some nontrivial work to set up an image generator, but this feels a lot closer to just taking his work…
In any event, it should have been tagged appropriately as graphic porny imagery, or posted in another section (in my own opinion of course)
i am him, there was another account with the name of mrmaybe59, but da is hostile nowadaysshrinker_s wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 4:42 pmA lot of this looks like the creator battlefiel56 on DA -- He left that platform and I was hoping that this was the return. Looks like it isn't. Does the original artist have another site?
So what exactly do we call this? It is more than just upscaling, it takes effort and knowledge to do these. But neither is it original work. Remakes?Bobascher wrote: ↑Fri Mar 15, 2024 6:55 pmI really struggle with you saying this is your content when you clearly took someone else’s work and then used AI to reskin it. Clearly some of these were originally Tedge’s work. No doubt there is some nontrivial work to set up an image generator, but this feels a lot closer to just taking his work…
What effort and knowledge does it take to create porny AI images, with all the usual physical defects associated with AI?
Yes, I always think it poor practice to simulate celebreties in sexually explicit situations. Like they'd be happy to see themselves like that? Not really fair I reckon.
About the same as your avatar with it's cut-out defects.Little Sally wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 5:53 pmWhat effort and knowledge does it take to create porny AI images, with all the usual physical defects associated with AI?
Can't say they impress me, and they should be tagged for what they are in any case.
Lol! There ain't no defects on that clever clogs, but then you wouldn't know a proper defect if it bit you on the bum! (apparently)Prof Sai wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 9:46 pmAbout the same as your avatar with it's cut-out defects.Little Sally wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 5:53 pmWhat effort and knowledge does it take to create porny AI images, with all the usual physical defects associated with AI?
Can't say they impress me, and they should be tagged for what they are in any case.
Seems you'll fit in well here then.dubiouskey wrote: ↑Thu May 02, 2024 10:07 pmWho says AI is going to destroy humanity? Seems pretty good to me so far.