Page 1 of 2

What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2019 4:29 pm
by BigBoy
There's so many contents related to SM more than SW on the internet. Actually I like SW because of the gaps of power. I love what tiny shrunken women feel about their states and about the enormous man who shrunk her. Shrunken woman might feel vulnerable, powerless and humiliating. Also I like the sense of superiority that man feels in front of very tiny woman. Therefore I kind of hate SM contents because it means totally opposite situation to SW moment. What do you guys feel about SM?

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2019 6:25 pm
by SWS33K3R776
SM isn't my thing, but I'm not gonna bash it or give it a lot of crap since it's a fantasy for some guys much like SW is a fantasy for some women. I see a lot of SM content then SW but I just move on until I see more SW focused content. I enjoy SW but I wouldn't want someone bashing that enjoyable interest.

What I'm saying is if someone is into SM then hey more fun for them; I'll just stick to the more adorable Shrunken women, why because it's fascinating and unique and sometimes sexy or even adventurous depending on the little lady.

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2019 8:44 pm
by shrinker_s
I am also a fan of SW. I totally agree with both or your regarding the non-judgement of SM; like I saw on a tinder profile one time"no judgement, just not my kink.". So when I see SM I move on as well. I take BigBoy's view that it about the power or more to the point the powerlessness of the shrunken woman. The idea that if she even wasn't in the current situation she would still be in a full sized world and danger is all around.

It is unfortunate that there is not as much SW relative to SM, but that makes the hunting for it half the fun.

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2019 3:22 am
by BigBoy
SWS33K3R776 wrote:
Thu Sep 12, 2019 6:25 pm
SM isn't my thing, but I'm not gonna bash it or give it a lot of crap since it's a fantasy for some guys much like SW is a fantasy for some women. I see a lot of SM content then SW but I just move on until I see more SW focused content. I enjoy SW but I wouldn't want someone bashing that enjoyable interest.

What I'm saying is if someone is into SM then hey more fun for them; I'll just stick to the more adorable Shrunken women, why because it's fascinating and unique and sometimes sexy or even adventurous depending on the little lady.
I agree your opinion. I don't blame or bash people who have SM fantasy because it is a great fantasy for them. I respect. What I said is I just disike the situation of SM not the people who has this fantasy.

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2019 6:39 am
by Kondo
Not a fan of SM and it's a shame there isn't as much SW content as SM on the internet. I've stumbled across many SM scenarios that I thought were neat and wished there were SW versions of them...

Oddly enough though, while I consider myself straight I'm kinda digging SC content. There's something about a man and a woman being tiny and naked and struggling together against the dangers of their now giant world :)

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 10:28 am
by Josh the Cyborg
I am not a fan of SM. I kinda always assumed it was just an extension of GTS. I used to be into being an SM before my hormones took more and more control of my size fantasies, because of my GTS characters, but now days I just like girls being tiny. I try not to judge sm, but if I am being honest even when I was into being one around a normal size girl I was not ok with other SM’s around, or giant males for that matter. As already stated it’s just not my kink. I like GTS simply so I can shrink the Giantesses to toy sizes compared to me, and I am over the giant men thing because honestly I fantasize about being one, just instead of being giant I shrink girls, have had the fantasy of being a giant man on a planet of 1 to 5 inch tall women before.

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 2:39 pm
by Sdk
Not really a SM, but in role play, taking turns being shrunk can be fun.

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:11 am
by kira123
Never a fan of SM, but I still see that everywhere more than SW. And it's mostly on the GTS side of the the community. It's kinda disappointing, but very common.

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 7:48 pm
by ssb-swscreenshots
What disappoints me about the lack of SW content compared to SM is the fact that a lot of POV situations always involve the man being shrunk. How about shrinking the woman down to size, huh? Whether she gets a kick out of being shrunk herself depends on how she feels about it, I'd say. Maybe the situation she's in, too.

Of course, being a guy myself, I might be into SM if I weren't heterosexual. Since I'm not, it's really not my thing.

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Fri May 01, 2020 1:27 pm
by Mpr3311
Contrary to most in this topic, I am fine with SM content. While I’d prefer to shrink my partner or some of my female friends, I wouldn’t be upset if they chose to shrink me instead. I don’t correlate it as a GTS thing as I’m more focused on the process than the end result

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Fri May 01, 2020 2:22 pm
by FifteencentiKim
We are of two minds on this

Image

I personally don't have a problem with shrunken male stories, or having SM elements in a story about a predominantly SW story. Mind you, stories where the SM is the primary focus are not my cup of tea, but to each their own.

That being said, it does seem there are more GTS/SM sites out there than there are GT/SW, so I don't think SM fans will suffer if the SW sites want to exclude stories, drawings, etc., that are primarily SM in nature.

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Fri May 01, 2020 3:11 pm
by shrinky
Mpr3311 wrote:
Fri May 01, 2020 1:27 pm
Contrary to most in this topic, I am fine with SM content. While I’d prefer to shrink my partner or some of my female friends, I wouldn’t be upset if they chose to shrink me instead. I don’t correlate it as a GTS thing as I’m more focused on the process than the end result
I agree. Shrinking is cool. I don't get into giantess content or storylines. I focus on process type content, mainly shrinking women, but sometimes I imagine that I'm the one shrinking.

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Fri May 01, 2020 3:41 pm
by Mpr3311
shrinky wrote:
Fri May 01, 2020 3:11 pm
Mpr3311 wrote:
Fri May 01, 2020 1:27 pm
Contrary to most in this topic, I am fine with SM content. While I’d prefer to shrink my partner or some of my female friends, I wouldn’t be upset if they chose to shrink me instead. I don’t correlate it as a GTS thing as I’m more focused on the process than the end result
I agree. Shrinking is cool. I don't get into giantess content or storylines. I focus on process type content, mainly shrinking women, but sometimes I imagine that I'm the one shrinking.

Delightful to see I am not alone here

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Fri May 01, 2020 3:56 pm
by shrinky
Mpr3311 wrote:
Fri May 01, 2020 3:41 pm

Delightful to see I am not alone here
We should start a club

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Fri May 01, 2020 5:55 pm
by Mpr3311
shrinky wrote:
Fri May 01, 2020 3:56 pm
Mpr3311 wrote:
Fri May 01, 2020 3:41 pm

Delightful to see I am not alone here
We should start a club
What shall we entitle the club?

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Fri May 01, 2020 6:43 pm
by shrinky
Mpr3311 wrote:
Fri May 01, 2020 5:55 pm
shrinky wrote:
Fri May 01, 2020 3:56 pm

We should start a club
What shall we entitle the club?
More important is who else wants to join?

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Fri May 01, 2020 6:52 pm
by Mpr3311
shrinky wrote:
Fri May 01, 2020 6:43 pm
Mpr3311 wrote:
Fri May 01, 2020 5:55 pm
shrinky wrote:
Fri May 01, 2020 3:56 pm

We should start a club
What shall we entitle the club?
More important is who else wants to join?
Valid point.

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 7:46 am
by lefrenchie
I hate SM

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 1:09 pm
by Olo
FifteencentiKim wrote:
Fri May 01, 2020 2:22 pm
That being said, it does seem there are more GTS/SM sites out there than there are GT/SW, so I don't think SM fans will suffer if the SW sites want to exclude stories, drawings, etc., that are primarily SM in nature.
This. I have been more into F/m scenarios for most of my fetish "career," but I have always entertained M/f scenarios as well, and M/f remains in the minority in terms of online content. I continue to advocate both for more M/f content but also for greater inclusivity across size fantasy. I don't mind coming to a separate site for male-giant/shrunken-women content, but there's no reason to discourage F/m fans from being curious about shrunken women.

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 4:23 pm
by FifteencentiKim
Olo wrote:
Sat May 02, 2020 1:09 pm
I don't mind coming to a separate site for male-giant/shrunken-women content, but there's no reason to discourage F/m fans from being curious about shrunken women.
I agree. And nothing precludes a M/f fan from visiting F/m sites, and visa versa. The internet is not like the real world, where getting your passport stamped in one country precludes you from visiting another.

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 10:54 pm
by lbh
I first got into Gts/SM subject matter when a started out and it eventually lead me to SW. I still enjoy those, though I am more into the shrinking themes and like to mix and match those themes, Gts becoming tiny men shrinking smaller than SWs in turn about stories even shrunken couples stories. I think there is room for all of it :)

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Sun May 03, 2020 1:20 am
by FifteencentiKim
Well, I look at it like this. Let's say you lived in a city where you not only have the mega book store chains, but you have every kind of niche store you can imagine. Now, let's say you have this little nook store that does mysteries, but only what it considers real world mysteries. So it will have Arthur Conan Doyle and Carole Nelson Douglas on its shelf, and maybe even Tony Hillerman and Edith Pargeter, but it won't have Jim Butcher and Glen Cook. Now, I personally think they'd be missing out on some great mysteries, but to each their own. So if you could pick up the books you wanted in other stores, and most of the people who frequented this store didn't want novels about Dresden and Garrett on their shelves, wouldn't you ve unreasonable trying to force them to put these books on their shelves? Particularly since there were other stores you could go to get these selections?

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Sun May 03, 2020 6:59 am
by WhoAmI
From time to time i added an shrunken guy to my pictures and now, that the technology allows me to do it, i add characters with my own face to my scenes. Mostly as a giant, but sometimes also in the same size or even much smaller than the shrunken women in those scenes. But i would not post them to this board, there are enough places on the internet for that. Or maybe with a spoiler ?
Warning, contains 1 clothed SM with my face and a SWShow
dollhouse_giantess_by_sizeadventure_dcumqq5.jpg
dollhouse_giantess_by_sizeadventure_dcumqq5.jpg (639.99 KiB) Viewed 12662 times
carol_picked_me_up_by_sizeadventure_dcups1m.jpg
carol_picked_me_up_by_sizeadventure_dcups1m.jpg (739.74 KiB) Viewed 12662 times

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Mon May 04, 2020 12:22 pm
by FreakyDude
I started off into SW. As I explored SW content online, I found SM and GTS content. I discovered that I liked that too. I like SM for the same reasons women here like SW, I suppose. I like the loss of control to a giant woman. I like how gorgeous a woman is as a giantess.

Re: What do you guys think about SM?

Posted: Mon May 04, 2020 11:19 pm
by DrWonko
I think they are fine in their own forum.