Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
-
- Shrink Adept
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2018 3:23 pm
- Gender:
- Contact:
Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Greetings, here to invite you to my site: http://Shrinking-Woman.com/
You can also check updates in my page: https://www.facebook.com/ShrinkingWomanED
Enjoy it!
best regards
ilayhu
You can also check updates in my page: https://www.facebook.com/ShrinkingWomanED
Enjoy it!
best regards
ilayhu
Tags:
- Prof Sai
- Shrink Grand Master
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2018 11:27 pm
- Gender:
- Contact:
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
These all suffer from a technical pitfall with SW images: Everything is all about the giants, with the littles hard to even see or empathize with. Not one image has the face of a little person clearly visible. It is just people enjoying being cruel. Not my thing, I guess.
- Sumguy14
- Shrink Adept
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2020 1:55 pm
- Location: United States of WTF
- Gender:
- Contact:
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
My big complaint with the site is that they are posting previously available works as if they are new content about every other week. I also have a hard time justifying the membership fee when we only get 20 images a week. It's nothing personal, but I think I am done supporting the site until there is a build up of content that I don't already own.
Neat!
- kira123
- Shrink Master
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2018 3:53 pm
- Gender:
- Contact:
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Sometimes they even do remakes of past comics with newer programs or something. Nothing's changed except for the models and program themselves. Which makes things kinda bland and unremarkable. Like if you're gonna remake a past comic, add more into it than that to stand out.Sumguy14 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 06, 2022 2:48 pmMy big complaint with the site is that they are posting previously available works as if they are new content about every other week. I also have a hard time justifying the membership fee when we only get 20 images a week. It's nothing personal, but I think I am done supporting the site until there is a build up of content that I don't already own.
-
- Shrink Adept
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2018 3:23 pm
- Gender:
- Contact:
- JOE66
- Shrink Master
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2018 11:20 am
- Contact:
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Thanks for these super pictures!
-
- Shrink Adept
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2018 3:23 pm
- Gender:
- Contact:
- kira123
- Shrink Master
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2018 3:53 pm
- Gender:
- Contact:
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Liking "Who's the Boss? 5" so far.
-
- Shrink Adept
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2018 3:23 pm
- Gender:
- Contact:
-
- Shrink Adept
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2018 3:23 pm
- Gender:
- Contact:
-
- Shrink Adept
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2018 3:23 pm
- Gender:
- Contact:
-
- Shrink Adept
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2018 3:23 pm
- Gender:
- Contact:
-
- Shrink Adept
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2018 3:23 pm
- Gender:
- Contact:
-
- Shrink Master
- Posts: 685
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 10:31 am
- Contact:
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
It’s disappointing the site is choosing to use models that look like children
-
- Shrink Adept
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2018 3:23 pm
- Gender:
- Contact:
-
- Visitor
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2022 8:18 pm
- bobvan
- Shrink Master
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2022 2:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Who cares as long as they are not in sexual situations.
9K plus renders https://www.deviantart.com/bobvan/gallery
-
- Shrink Master
- Posts: 685
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 10:31 am
- Contact:
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
It is still on an adult fetish site. When the simple interaction of a two people of different sizes is titillating to some in the community, it is a sexual situation when it was created to satisfy someone of this fetish if everyone’s clothes remain on.
I get this is apparently a complicated subject, but it is needless in this regard. They can just use adult models, or they can remove all sexual content and claim it is a GT site exploring the trope of size play. But when there is a kid poking and prodding the body of a naked adult in a nonconsensual manner, that is shrinking porn.
- Hand-Holder
- Shrink Grand Master
- Posts: 1283
- Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2020 3:41 pm
- Location: Lisbon
- Contact:
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
Knew that website already, but thanks for the Pics... Is good to know there are several SW resources online besides GTS
My works are 100% free - Send a thanks here - https://www.patreon.com/SWErotica
- bobvan
- Shrink Master
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2022 2:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
So if we go by what you just said the last chapter of "Little Sally" I just posted makes me a Pedo? O..K you know all bout me
My fantasy is based on LOTG little people were threatened by giant men wimin children insects, animals and environment itself.
9K plus renders https://www.deviantart.com/bobvan/gallery
-
- Shrink Master
- Posts: 685
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 10:31 am
- Contact:
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
No, I did not say “bobvan is a pedo” anywhere. You are the one implying I saying that. I am saying that including children in pictures poking naked women provocatively is most likely child porn.
The child doesn’t have to be naked to be put into a sexual situation. I have no doubt there have been many clothed children in the real world made to touch an adult’s genitalia and I doubt anyone would question if that is pedo.
Just because it is a drawing or 3D model doesn’t obviate this fact. Anymore than a drawing of two adults having sex is most likely still porn. So if you have produced a picture of a child touching an adult in a sexually provocative nature, then you created child porn in my mind.
Now whether creating CP makes one a pedo or not, I can’t say. I don’t know what your proclivities are. You have to tell us that.
- bobvan
- Shrink Master
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2022 2:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
I agree I often say I create 3D fetish porn. Having said that chapters with children are never of sexual nature, its more about the power of them using little people as playthings. I had a pedo fan on D/A I know the difference. BTW this was only meant as a point of discussionBobascher wrote: ↑Tue Dec 27, 2022 5:45 pmNo, I did not say “bobvan is a pedo” anywhere. You are the one implying I saying that. I am saying that including children in pictures poking naked women provocatively is most likely child porn.
The child doesn’t have to be naked to be put into a sexual situation. I have no doubt there have been many clothed children in the real world made to touch an adult’s genitalia and I doubt anyone would question if that is pedo.
Just because it is a drawing or 3D model doesn’t obviate this fact. Anymore than a drawing of two adults having sex is most likely still porn. So if you have produced a picture of a child touching an adult in a sexually provocative nature, then you created child porn in my mind.
Now whether creating CP makes one a pedo or not, I can’t say. I don’t know what your proclivities are. You have to tell us that.
9K plus renders https://www.deviantart.com/bobvan/gallery
- bobvan
- Shrink Master
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2022 2:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
bobvan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 27, 2022 6:03 pmI agree I often say I create 3D fetish porn. Having said that chapters with children are never of sexual nature, its more about the power of them using little people as playthings. I had a pedo fan on D/A I know the difference. Creating CP = Child porn took me a few to get that. I don't create CP as far as I am concerned. There are simply chapters in some of my LOTG episode that have porn & some that have Children. There is NEVER any porn in their chapters.Bobascher wrote: ↑Tue Dec 27, 2022 5:45 pmNo, I did not say “bobvan is a pedo” anywhere. You are the one implying I saying that. I am saying that including children in pictures poking naked women provocatively is most likely child porn.
The child doesn’t have to be naked to be put into a sexual situation. I have no doubt there have been many clothed children in the real world made to touch an adult’s genitalia and I doubt anyone would question if that is pedo.
Just because it is a drawing or 3D model doesn’t obviate this fact. Anymore than a drawing of two adults having sex is most likely still porn. So if you have produced a picture of a child touching an adult in a sexually provocative nature, then you created child porn in my mind.
Now whether creating CP makes one a pedo or not, I can’t say. I don’t know what your proclivities are. You have to tell us that.
Does that make it CP? As previously mentioned, the last little Sally chapter where she is given to a little girl as a gift. Out of respect for Sally, there is no porn in her thread. Does the fact it's posted on this site forum make it CP? I think that is an uptight POV & a stretch IMO.
BTW this was only meant as a point of discussion
9K plus renders https://www.deviantart.com/bobvan/gallery
- bobvan
- Shrink Master
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2022 2:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
bobvan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 27, 2022 8:44 pmbobvan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 27, 2022 6:03 pmI agree I often say I create 3D fetish porn. Having said that chapters with children are never of sexual nature, its more about the power of them using little people as playthings. I had a pedo fan on D/A I know the difference. Creating CP = Child porn took me a few to get that. I don't create CP as far as I am concerned. There are simply chapters in some of my LOTG episode that have porn & some that have Children. There is NEVER any porn in their chapters.Bobascher wrote: ↑Tue Dec 27, 2022 5:45 pm
No, I did not say “bobvan is a pedo” anywhere. You are the one implying I saying that. I am saying that including children in pictures poking naked women provocatively is most likely child porn.
The child doesn’t have to be naked to be put into a sexual situation. I have no doubt there have been many clothed children in the real world made to touch an adult’s genitalia and I doubt anyone would question if that is pedo.
Just because it is a drawing or 3D model doesn’t obviate this fact. Anymore than a drawing of two adults having sex is most likely still porn. So if you have produced a picture of a child touching an adult in a sexually provocative nature, then you created child porn in my mind.
Now whether creating CP makes one a pedo or not, I can’t say. I don’t know what your proclivities are. You have to tell us that.
Does that make it CP? As previously mentioned, the last little Sally chapter I recently posted, where she is given to a little girl as a gift. Out of respect for Sally. There is no porn in her thread period. Does the fact it's posted on this forum make it CP? I think that is an uptight POV & a stretch IMO.
I do get your point in regards to the above-mentioned imagery.
BTW this was only meant as a point of discussion
9K plus renders https://www.deviantart.com/bobvan/gallery
-
- Shrink Master
- Posts: 685
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 10:31 am
- Contact:
Re: Shrinking-Woman Site - Ilayhu
I appreciate the discussion and honestly I have probably drawn some hard lines. I know some of my earlier pieces had a shrunken kid that I posted to DA. Then I had some interactions with some true pedos and maybe I over course corrected, but I feel it’s safer TBH.
Not saying that interactions between kids and adults in shrunken scenarios can’t be cute / platonic / nonsexual, but given the venue we are in, it treads a line to me.
In some of my other photoshop work which isn’t posted to a “bobascher” account, such as Facebook photoshop requests, I do still make art with children and shrinking troupes (e.g., putting kids in hot chocolate cups, putting kids in costumes inside toy boxes as if they are the toy), but it’s in a clearly not fetish venue.
So again, not calling anyone a pedo, but using kids in any fetish site or in a fetish adjacent context gets really squeamish for me, particularly since, as you and I have experienced, there are many pedos with this kink. Having that in time and space barrier really makes things safer.
Not saying that interactions between kids and adults in shrunken scenarios can’t be cute / platonic / nonsexual, but given the venue we are in, it treads a line to me.
In some of my other photoshop work which isn’t posted to a “bobascher” account, such as Facebook photoshop requests, I do still make art with children and shrinking troupes (e.g., putting kids in hot chocolate cups, putting kids in costumes inside toy boxes as if they are the toy), but it’s in a clearly not fetish venue.
So again, not calling anyone a pedo, but using kids in any fetish site or in a fetish adjacent context gets really squeamish for me, particularly since, as you and I have experienced, there are many pedos with this kink. Having that in time and space barrier really makes things safer.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests